Article

The making of a Malayan propagandist: the communists, the British and C.C. Too

From Munshipedia, the MBRAS digital historical encyclopedia

The making of a Malayan propagandist: the communists, the British and C.C. Too

Kumar Ramakrishna, writing in 2000 in the Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, reconstructs the career of C. C. Too, the Malayan Chinese propagandist who headed the government’s Psychological Warfare Section during the Malayan Emergency (1948–60), arguing that Too’s unique combination of intimate knowledge of Communist psychology and British psywar principles made him the decisive factor behind the mass surrenders that shattered the MCP by the end of 1958.

Summary

Ramakrishna’s central intervention is to elevate psychological warfare from a peripheral explanatory factor in Emergency historiography to the primary mechanism that ended the conflict. While existing accounts attribute the government’s victory to MCP weaknesses, tough Emergency regulations, the ‘minimum force’ philosophy, and the promise of Merdeka, Ramakrishna contends that it was specifically the Merdeka amnesty of September 1957—designed and executed under Too’s direction—that precipitated the catastrophic Communist surrenders of 1958. The article traces Too’s biographical arc from his bilingual education in interwar Kuala Lumpur, through his post-war flirtation with the MCP during the British Military Administration, to his recruitment by the Emergency Information Services in 1951 and his eventual rise to Head of the Psychological Warfare Section. A key analytical claim is that Too’s effectiveness derived from two distinct but complementary sources: his grasp of Communist psychology, developed through personal contact during the BMA and intensive study of captured documents, and the philosophical framework of British psywar—credibility through truth-telling, respect for audience sensitivities, impersonal news, and the ‘psychological moment’—which he absorbed from Hugh Carleton Greene, the EIS’s founding head.

The article also challenges a widely held assumption in the historiography: that terrorists surrendered primarily because Merdeka removed the political justification for their struggle. Ramakrishna argues, drawing on Too’s own testimony, that the rank and file gave up only when they realized that Chin Peng would not be permitted by the Tunku to seek better exit terms at a second round of peace negotiations. Too’s refusal to accept further Baling talks, not independence itself, was the ‘straw that broke the camel’s back.’ The narrative is informed by hitherto neglected primary sources, including Too’s personal papers, his 1981 Granada Television interview transcripts, and Department of Information records at the National Archives of Malaysia, which together allow Ramakrishna to reconstruct internal government debates, Too’s working methods, and the operational tempo of the PWS in a way that previous secondary literature has not.

Key Findings

  • The annual surrender rate stood at approximately 200 per year through 1957, but exceeded 500 in 1958; against a peak MRLA strength of 8,000 in 1951, only 868 terrorists remained by the end of 1958, of whom 485 were on the Thai side of the border (pp. 67–68).
  • Too joined the Emergency Information Services on 26 February 1951 on a one-year contract; the newspaper New Path News, which he drafted and illustrated, attained a circulation of 90,000 by January 1952 (pp. 76, 79).
  • Too resigned on 29 November 1952 (effective 1 March 1953) following a clash with Director-General A. D. C. Peterson over organizational control; he was re-employed on 1 April 1955 and appointed acting Head of the Psychological Warfare Section on 12 November 1956, confirmed on 6 February 1958 (pp. 80–83).
  • The monthly surrender rate fell from 20.66 in 1955 to 11.25 in 1956 as terrorists adopted a ‘wait-and-see’ posture ahead of Merdeka, before the Merdeka amnesty and the Tunku’s refusal of further peace talks triggered the 1958 collapse (p. 78).
  • Following the defection of Tan Guat (second-in-command, 4th Company, 3rd Regiment, MRLA) on 22 April 1951, 250,000 leaflets bearing his photograph were air-dropped within 48 hours in the area where his unit was operating (p. 85).
  • The PWS establishment comprised 19 staff: one Division I officer, two Division II, nine Division III, and four Special Ex-Communist (SEP) personnel (p. 81, n. 71).

Conclusion

Ramakrishna concludes that C. C. Too warrants a substantially higher profile in Emergency historiography, having been reduced to a peripheral figure in existing accounts. His effectiveness as a propagandist was the product of four converging factors: a thorough bilingual education that gave him equal facility in two cultural worlds; a thorough repulsion at MCP methods of coercion and extortion encountered during the BMA; a gravitational pull toward British officers who displayed what he perceived as liberal, egalitarian instincts (Thompson, Greene) rather than colonial haughtiness; and the pressurizing crucible of the EIS and PWS at Bluff Road, where his expertise was forged under operational conditions.

Context

  • Primary archival collections explored include the C. C. Too Papers (in the author’s possession), Department of Information records at the National Archives of Malaysia, the ‘End of Empire’ Papers at Rhodes House Library, Oxford (containing the 1981 Granada Television interview transcripts), the Talbot Papers at the Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives, and Public Record Office series CO 537, 717, 967, 1022, 1030, and WO 291 (p. 87).
  • The article’s historiographical contribution lies in challenging the dominant narrative that Merdeka alone caused the 1958 mass surrenders, and in demonstrating through internal government records and Too’s own testimony that the Tunku’s refusal to permit a second round of Baling talks was the proximate trigger for the Communist collapse (p. 78).

References