Batara Guru
R.J. Wilkinson published this short article in 1897 in the Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, examining the identity and significance of Batara Guru (Sang-yang Guru) in pre-Mohammedan Malay religious practice and its relationship to the Hindu deity Siva. Wilkinson argues that the “Petera Guru” or “Mentala Guru” invoked in Malay pawang rituals is the same figure as Batara Guru of Javanese and Balinese Hinduism, and that the survival of these invocations among the Orang Laut and rural Malays constitutes a fragment of the old animistic-Hindu religious layer now rapidly disappearing.
Summary
The article is built around two passages published in the Selangor Journal (1894 and 1895) in which a pawang invokes four names over newly cleared padi land: “Toh Mentala Guru,” “Sarajah Guru,” “Gempitar A’lam,” and “Sarajah Malek.” Wilkinson proposes a corrected reading of these names—identifying them all as epithets of a single deity, Batara Guru—and argues that “Malek” is simply the Arabic word for “King” rather than a proper name. He connects this to the Mayong invocation in which “Petera Guru” is addressed as “the original teacher, who art from the beginning, and who art incarnate from thy birth,” and to the pawang’s description of Mentala Guru as an all-powerful spirit who could restore the dead to life and who “took the place of Allah before the advent of Mohammedanism.”
Wilkinson then turns to Malay literary evidence. In the Hikayat Sang Samba (a Malay version of the Bhaumakavya), Batara Guru appears as a supreme God who alone possesses the water of life that resurrects slain heroes—an attribute matching the pawang’s account. He also presents a set of pantuns collected from a “comparatively illiterate Malay” in which Batara Guru is identified with “Berahmana” (Brahmana), suggesting a modern folk etymology that conflated the figure with Brahma. Wilkinson notes that the Panji Cycle references in these pantuns confirm the Javanese literary source of the legend.
A final section examines the honorifics “Batara” and “Sang-yang” in Malay usage, arguing that both are restricted to the great Hindu deities and that “Batara Guru” is an exception to the rule that “Batara” is limited to actual names rather than epithets—evidence that the original meaning of “Guru” had been lost and the phrase had become a proper name. Wilkinson closes with a reference to the Sila-silah Raja-raja di tanah Jawa genealogy, in which “Guru” is placed as the father of the Hindu Trinity and of Sri (the goddess of grain), linking the figure to the padi invocations recorded by Skeat.
Key Findings
- The pawang’s four invocations (“Toh Mentala Guru,” “Sarajah Guru,” “Gempitar A’lam,” “Sarajah Malek”) are argued to be four epithets of a single deity, Batara Guru, with “Malek” being Arabic for “King” rather than a proper name (pp. 307–308).
- In the Hikayat Sang Samba, Batara Guru alone possesses the ayer utama jiwa (water of life) that resurrects slain heroes, a power matching the pawang’s description of Mentala Guru as able to “restore the dead to life” (p. 309).
- The honorifics “Batara” and “Sang-yang” are restricted in Malay usage to the great Hindu deities (e.g., Batara Kala, Batara Indra, Sang-yang Bisnu) and are never applied to demi-gods or mortals, who receive only “Sang” (p. 310).
- “Batara Guru” is identified as the sole exception to the rule that “Batara” is limited to proper names rather than epithets, indicating the original meaning of “Guru” had been lost (p. 310).
- The Sila-silah Raja-raja di tanah Jawa genealogy places “Guru” as the father of Sang-yang Sambu, Berahma, Mahadewa, Bisnu, and Dewi Seri—treating Guru as distinct from Mahadewa (Siva) and as progenitor of the Hindu Trinity (pp. 310–311).
- Wilkinson concurs with Skeat in expressing concern that these fragments of old Malay folklore are “fast dying out” and that “very few Malays I have met now know the names of the four deities” (p. 308).
Conclusion
Wilkinson’s definitive takeaway is that Batara Guru represents the supreme deity of the pre-Mohammedan Malay religious system, directly continuous with the Siva worship of the Javanese and Balinese, and that the surviving pawang invocations and folk pantuns are the last vestiges of a religious tradition now in rapid extinction. The article is fundamentally an act of salvage documentation, urging scholarly attention before these fragments are lost entirely.
Context
- The article draws on primary sources published in the Selangor Journal (1894, 1895) and on Wilkinson’s own field collection of pantuns from an illiterate Malay informant; it also engages with W.W. Skeat’s Essays relating to Indo-China (Second Series) as a secondary reference.
- Wilkinson was a Straits Settlements civil servant and naturalist; the article reflects the contemporary colonial-scholarly interest in documenting “native” religious practices before their disappearance under Islam and modernization.