Article

‘A Malay poem on New Year’s Day (1848)’: Munshi Abdullah’s lyric carnival

From Munshipedia, the MBRAS digital historical encyclopedia

‘A Malay poem on New Year’s Day (1848)’: Munshi Abdullah’s lyric carnival

Raimy Ché-Ross’s 2008 article re-appraises Munshi Abdullah’s brief syair “Malay Poem on New Year’s Day (1848),” published in James Richardson Logan’s Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia, by providing a full standard Malay transliteration, English translation, and extended commentary. Writing to mark the work’s 160th anniversary, Ché-Ross argues that the poem’s critical verses—long overshadowed by its formulaic opening praise of Queen Victoria—reveal a more complex and assertive Abdullah who resented the exploitation of his fellow natives by the colonial elite, thereby challenging the reductive “tali barut” (collaborator) caricature that has dominated modern assessments of the Munshi.

Summary

The article situates the syair within the broader colonial practice of organising public sports and games to mark civic occasions, a tradition in Singapore that had been firmly established since at least 1834 and was sustained until the 1920s. These events served the dual function of entertaining the native populace while visually reinforcing the supremacy of the British imperial order. Ché-Ross draws on secondary accounts—including Wildman’s 1899 description, the Singapore Free Press, and the Bloomfield Douglas diary—to reconstruct the social and ideological framework within which Abdullah observed the 1848 celebrations at the Esplanade by the Padang.

The core analytical move is to read the poem’s opening stanzas of praise to Queen Victoria not as evidence of sycophancy but as customary pro forma acknowledgments of patronage, comparable to loyal addresses published as late as 1934 by the ultra-nationalist Warta Malaya. Ché-Ross then pivots to the poem’s more caustic middle and closing stanzas, where Abdullah registers his indignation at the physical degradation endured by participants (sack races, greasy pole climbing, coin-scrambling in the mud) and his contempt for the Orang Putih who orchestrated their humiliation for amusement. This contrast, Ché-Ross argues, undermines the popular impression that Abdullah was purely critical of Malays while blindly admiring the British; rather, he detested the foibles of both.

The article also reconstructs the likely circumstances of the poem’s publication. Ché-Ross hypothesises that Abdullah may have been specifically commissioned by Logan to fill a gap in the journal’s collation, explaining why the syair is absent from the volume’s table of contents and index, and why it terminates abruptly in mid-narration without a concluding statement. The piece closes by advocating for a “subaltern” approach to Abdullah’s auxiliary works—his topical syair in particular—which have been largely neglected in favour of his radical memoirs and travelogues, and which offer a persistent, if subtle, internal critique of the colonial order.

Key Findings

  • The syair comprises 96 lyric sentences forming 24 four-line stanzas, occupying two pages (pp. 81–2) or one leaf of Volume II (1848) of Logan’s Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia; it is not listed in the volume’s table of contents or index (p. 63).
  • The New Year’s Day sports at the Esplanade had been a fixed annual feature since at least 1834 (Buckley 1984: 235, cited p. 50); the Straits Times of 8 January 1848 excused its lack of coverage on the grounds that preparing the outward mail had consumed its editorial time (p. 50, n. 24).
  • The horse race was supervised by Joseph Wise, a partner in Boustead and Co from 1848 until his return to England in 1853, and took place in front of Mr. Almeida’s house (pp. 71, 73 n. 37).
  • The Esplanade was known to the Tamil community as “January Thidal” or “January Place” right up to the 1920s (Makepeace et al. 1991: 482, cited p. 68 n. 33).
  • Abdullah’s works have remained consistently in print for over 170 years, from the 1835 publication of Hikayat Kalila Daminah to the 2004 Kassim Ahmad edition of Hikayat Abdullah (p. 60).
  • The syair is absent from the bibliographies of Hill (1970), Datoek Besar and Roolvink (1953), Ibrahim and Ahmad (1976), Jihaty (1979), Raja Hamzah Yunus et al. (1981), Siti Aishah (1996), and Saksono and Sriyanto (2000); it was mentioned only briefly by Skinner (1978: 483 n. 14) (p. 50 n. 5).

Conclusion

Ché-Ross’s definitive takeaway is that Abdullah was neither the blind Anglophile nor the proto-nationalist for which he has been variously cast in modern historiography. The syair demonstrates that Abdullah wielded his pen as a tool of calculated social critique—praising foreign achievement to spur self-improvement among his own people, while simultaneously exposing the degrading mechanics of colonial spectacle. His auxiliary topical works, though short and easily dismissed, constitute a persistent and consistent register of dissent that, when read alongside his better-known memoirs, reveals a writer who was “the first to offer an internal critique of the Western colonial order in his part of the world” (Farish 2005: 66, cited p. 77).

Context

  • Primary archival consultations were conducted at the Petherick Reading Room, National Library of Australia (Canberra), and the Perpustakaan Peringatan Za’ba, Universiti Malaya (Kuala Lumpur) (p. 74 n. 1).
  • The article’s historiographical contribution lies in redirecting scholarly attention from Abdullah’s major prose works (memoirs, travelogues) to his neglected topical syair, arguing that these shorter pieces contain a “discourse of dissent” that has been systematically overlooked in favour of debates over his radical autobiography (pp. 74–77).

References